Loading your workspacePreparing the page and its market data.
Polymarket · SportsClosed
Loading the chart…
| Outcome | Chance | 24h | 1 week | Bid · Ask | 24h volume | Ends |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault | 100% | — | — | >99¢ · 100¢ (<1¢) | — | ended |
| ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Match O/U 21.5 | 100% | — | — | 80¢ · 100¢ (20¢) | — | ended |
| Completed Match | 100% | — | — | >99¢ · 100¢ (<1¢) | — | ended |
| ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 100% | — | — | 80¢ · 100¢ (20¢) | — | ended |
| ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Set 1 Winner | 0% | — | — | — · <1¢ | — | ended |
| ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 100% | — | — | >99¢ · 100¢ (<1¢) | — | ended |
| ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Set 2 Winner | 100% | — | — | >99¢ · 100¢ (<1¢) | — | ended |
| ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 0% | — | — | — · <1¢ | — | ended |
| ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% | — | — | — · 1¢ | — | ended |
| ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 100% | — | — | >99¢ · 100¢ (<1¢) | — | ended |
| ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Match O/U 22.5 | 100% | — | — | 99¢ · 100¢ (1¢) | — | ended |
| ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 0% | — | — | — · <1¢ | — | ended |
| ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% | — | — | — · 20¢ | — | ended |
| ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 100% | — | — | >99¢ · 100¢ (<1¢) | — | ended |
| ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 0% | — | — | — · <1¢ | — | ended |
| ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault Match O/U 23.5 | 100% | — | — | 99¢ · 100¢ (1¢) | — | ended |
| When | Trader | Outcome | Bet | Size | P&L now | Insider |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58d | Vigilant-Environment | ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault | BuyMikael Arseneault60¢ → 0¢ | $1,117 | −$1,117 −100% | 6 |
This market refers to the tennis match between Matisse Farzam and Mikael Arseneault in the ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard, originally scheduled for August 26, 2026 at 10:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Matisse Farzam' if Matisse Farzam advances against Mikael Arseneault. This market will resolve to 'Mikael Arseneault' if Mikael Arseneault advances against Matisse Farzam. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 9, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Sources: Polymarket's Gamma API, its CLOB price history and its Data API, read every two minutes. Prices are each outcome's Yes price, which is the market's probability: 100¢ for ITF MEN - SINGLES: M15 Champaign, IL (USA), hard: Matisse Farzam vs Mikael Arseneault means the market gives it about 100%.